Pages: 37-47
Abstract
The ability to engage in rational thought and acquire knowledge is what elevates us to the status of human beings. Rationality is undeniably the foremost criterion for the development of a human mind. But how much do we actually know? Also, whatever we are capable of knowing, is that sufficient to know the reality of the human life? While rationality is central to intellectual development, its limitations become evident when addressing existential questions, emotions, or consciousness. This paper explores the dichotomy between conventional logic and “higher reasoning” (intuition, wisdom) as discussed in Vedānta and also at some places in Western philosophy. Drawing from Kant, Radhakrishnan, and quantum physics, it argues for an expanded epistemology that integrates empirical and transcendental modes of understanding. The concept of “higher reasoning” often transcends mere intellectual or logical deduction, extending into areas of intuition, insight, wisdom, and a more holistic understanding of reality. The aforementioned topic has been a consistent point of inquiry for both Eastern and Western philosophical traditions. Significantly, Eastern philosophical discourse has frequently furnished indications regarding the nature of higher reasoning. The ensuing chapter represents an attempt to explore this elevated epistemic domain.
Access Full Article
Purchase this article to read the complete paper and download the PDF