Pages: 71-84
Abstract
Human societies have long imagined the ideal of a just world—from Plato’s kallipolis and Confucian ren to the Enlightenment doctrines of natural rights articulated by Locke, Rousseau, and Wollstonecraft—linking justice to dignity, recognition, equality, and the happiness of all. Modern rights frameworks, from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to contemporary theories of recognition, communicative reason, and epistemic justice, extend these aspirations, yet they often struggle to capture the lived textures of injustice and the emotional stakes of human flourishing. This paper argues that literature bridges this gap by staging conflicts between oppression and resistance, silence and testimony, erasure and remembrance, becoming both a repository of early ethical ideals and a catalyst for contemporary struggles for justice. Drawing on rights theory, Habermas’s communicative reason, Nussbaum’s capabilities approach, Taylor’s politics of recognition, Crenshaw’s intersectionality, Fricker’s epistemic justice, and Freirean civic pedagogy, the study shows how literary texts cultivate the interpretive, emotional, and dialogic capacities essential for democratic life. Through readings of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, Virginia Woolf, Albert Camus, Nadine Gordimer, Saadat Hasan Manto, Leslie Marmon Silko, José Saramago, and Gabriel García Márquez, it demonstrates how literature exposes interconnected structures of domination while modelling alternative ethical horizons—linguistic sovereignty, feminist agency, solidarity, ecological balance, and memory as resistance—making literature indispensable to sustaining humanity’s enduring aspiration for a more just and happier world.
Access Full Article
Purchase this article to read the complete paper and download the PDF